(PECL memcache >= 0.2.0)
Memcache::increment -- memcache_increment — Incrementa el valor de un elemento
Memcache::increment() incrementa el valor de un elemento
identificado por la clave key por el valor
value. Si el elemento identificado por la clave
key no es de tipo numérico y no puede
ser convertido a número, el valor de este elemento será definido a
value.
Memcache::increment() no crea
un elemento si no existe.
Nota:
No se debe utilizar memcache::increment() con elementos almacenados comprimidos. En este caso, la llamada a la función Memcache::get() fallará.
keyClave del elemento a incrementar.
value
Incrementa el elemento por value.
Devuelve el valor del nuevo elemento en caso de éxito o false si ocurre un error.
Ejemplo #1 Ejemplo con Memcache::increment()
<?php
/* API procedimental */
$memcache_obj = memcache_connect('memcache_host', 11211);
/* incrementación del contador en 2 */
$current_value = memcache_increment($memcache_obj, 'counter', 2);
/* API orientada a objetos */
$memcache_obj = new Memcache;
$memcache_obj->connect('memcache_host', 11211);
/* incrementación del contador en 3 */
$current_value = $memcache_obj->increment('counter', 3);
?>
Instead of checking the value before incrementing, you can simply ADD it instead before incrementing each time. If it's already there, your ADD is ignored, and if it's not there, it's set.
If you add($memcacheKey, 0) and then increment($memcacheKey, 1) in that order, you avoid all possible race conditions. If two threads are running this code concurrently, you will always end up with your value being 2 no matter which order the threads execute in.Please note:
If the key does not exist, memcache does NOT return false (as you might expect) but 0.
You won't get any hint that the key did not exist and still does not exist and that nothing was incremented.When the key doesn't exist it may return either bool(false) or int(0) (I get different return values on different servers), so be careful if you check for something like ($memcache->increment($key) === false).Be careful to use Memcache::decrement() and never Memcache::increment() with a negative value.
The check that prevents Memcache::decrement() from going negative is not in place with Memcache::increment(), so you can end up with a garbage integer on the order of 18 quintillion stored in place of the expected value.